Do you agree with the view that the Beatles “changed the world in the sixties”? Essay

Its clear from any angle that The Beatles had an incredible impact on the humanity in the mid- sixties, merely I hypothecate its evident stating they changed the adult male is going too far, and in actual fact they merely reflected a changing world. origin 18 workforcetions the view that The Beatles changed the world in the sixties, and it references to some of the coeval debates from the decade, which the four-man traffic circle had an influence on legalization of drugs, the fight in Vietnam and tralatitious and alternate religions.Ian Inglis also declares them as one of the twentieth centurys more(prenominal) signifi groundworkt achieve ments which is align to an extent some of their views and actions on the decades disputes were eye-openers to society. Although, ejaculate 18 also makes the comment that the anchor ring are innovators, which is back up by source 17s view theyre not the architects of the new spring chicken finale. This shows it the counter argumen t they exampled a shifting world and society.To say the Beatles changed the world in the sixties holds some truth they were the early band to speak out about the Vietnam War, the first-year band to openly experiment with alternate religions and criticize new(prenominal) traditional faiths and the scarcely band to public aloney c completely for the legalization of marijuana. So source 18s view that the four men were prominent across a wide range of categories including historical, sociological, cultural and musical and that their opinions were sought out, heard and acted on is obviously evident peculiarly when relating to the bands protests against the Vietnam War.Perhaps one of the bands most famous demonstrations, in 1965, sent shock waves through the country the Beatles were the first band to be honored with the nations highest a contendd, save Lennon rejected his to protest against Britains involvement in the war with Vietnam. He also coined the renowned phrases make lo ve not war and give peace a chance.Its obviously apparent that the band voiced and shaped some of the strongest protests against the cruel war they helped to expose to society how bad the situation was in Vietnam, giving the conflict details higher ken than ahead. Without their high profile protests, its hard to sayhow the population would boast reacted to the horrifying circumstances of the war, but the Beatles gave them a route to take, they employ the population to support their view against conflict and unnecessary deaths, therefore this argues that the band changed the world to manipulate their opinions.Supporting this is the negativity in source 16,Lennon says the same idiots are running everything his haughty words, aimed at the government, are acceptable realizeing the war is still current in 1971 when the statement is make, hes angry at the pointless fighting and deaths- much like the rest of the population.The Beatles involvement with alternate religions made headl ines and influenced a higher sense in the world therefore this could also argue the view that they changed the world. Indian Mysticism and Transcendental Meditation were two of the faiths they experimented with, however it was their dismissal of the Christian/Catholic belief that was the big impact source 18 supports the idea they made significant achievements in the cultural category. George Harrison was the first member of the band to experiment with a new religion Hinduism which he took interest in aft(prenominal) being handed a book on reincarnation during the filming of Help in 1965, the other members shortly followed suit.Their choices to explore other faiths and cultures became high profile and famous decisions 65 reporters followed the four men when they travelled to India in February 1968, where they advanced in meditation classes and followed the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi religion. All of this was new and exciting or shocking to horse opera civilization no one of high status had done outrageous things like this and therefore it promote the more rebellious younker culture to change.Not only did their views on alternate religions make headlines, so did their opinions on traditional faiths. August 1964, the Beatles press officer said the band were so anti-Christ they shock me which isnt an easy thing this opinion is furthered by Lennons 1970 song God in which he sings I dont believe in savior and I dont believe in Bible.Also notice the lyrics his 1970 song Imagine, imagine theres no heaven no hell below us no religion too. The sixties was still a while where traditional faith was strong, people went to church every Sunday and the contraceptive pillwas only legalized in 1961 so for the four men to openly express theyre non-believers, it was shocking. New youth culture would have seen it as an escape to live life with more freedom, as the older and younger generation initiative was wider than ever young people looked up to the band as idols.The famous four lead this contemporary debate more than other factors did they helped to shape a new younger religious culture, supported by source 17, they made new religion and dismissal of the traditional instantly chic for the millions of fans who looked to the group for counsellor.Furthermore, the Beatles drug do was constantly in the press during the sixties a time where the world learnt more and more about different pills, inhalants and injections. Source 18 states that the Beatles opinions on the legalization of drugs were sought out, heard and acted on particularly in 1967 when the four young men called for the legalization of marijuana through an advertisement in The Times.This was a big thing it was a fairly new drugs in UK and American culture, in front the sixties tobacco and alcohol were the only widespread drugs. Although their plea didnt work, the advertisement still bring aboutd higher awareness of the hallucinogenic drug, which encouraged more people to try or use it. In 2004, Paul McCartney admitted they used drugs as an influence to most of their music including Got to Get You in my Life which was about cannabis and confessed the infamous suspicion that Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds was about LSD. By the late sixties the band had managed to change how the youth spent their time the younger generations now geted to hang out in private open areas, auditory modality to their psychedelic rock, growing their hair long, dressing in colourful clothes and taking mind-altering drugs the hipster era had begun.Although, it seems to me, its more evident that the Beatles didnt change the world in the sixties, but in fact they merely reflected a changing world this opinion is supported by both source 17 and 18. Its stated by Allan Kozinn in source 17 that although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth culture, they were by no means its architects which is also supported in source 18 by the inclusion of the words innovators and spokes person these words infer that the four men were imitating originalviews and opinions.Source 16 also agrees with this opinion to an extent Lennon often had a controversial provenance when talking to the media or the press, in this instance he would be saying its still the same society and world, to date the middle class people follow our stupid ways which refers to the its exactly the same, the burgher constitution and we dressed up comments.Also with Lennons statement we have to consider that in 1971 the band had split this is the same year as the statement was made therefore its going to be negative.Source 17 states that the Beatles had the ability to detect trends early and made them instantly chic for millions of fans I signify its evident this was the case for their involvement in the protests against the Vietnam War.The four young men didnt cause the anti-war views and opinions, they already existed among millions of people considering the UK was only effective gettin g better after World War 2, the men simply gave the ideas a louder voice, they catalyzed the protests into the media so larger amounts of people would see and agree. In an interview with Lennon and McCartney, in 1968, they were asked, the US has been plagued by the Vietnam War, and the world has been concerned, whats your views? in which Lennon replied, its another piece of insanity. In the question we can understand that the rest of the world had the same views as the Beatles did, the four men are repeating the views to create higher awareness and support evidence of media manipulation.Two historic period earlier, during a press conference in New York, George Harrison made a similar reply to a similar question its just war is wrong and its obvious its wrong using the word obvious shows that he knows its a widespread opinion.Through all of this we can see that the band werent merely on their views and opinions in fact I think that most of their ideas they will have heard before from their elders. They use their popity and status to showcase the concerns the public have had for many years, the rejoinder of the Vietnam War is horrifying and unreassuring to many of the younger and older generations most people would want a stop to it straight away, source 18 supports this argument through the words innovators and spokespersons.Arguing this even further is their 1968 song Revolution which includes the lyrics we all want to change the world, you tell me thats evolution, this inclusion of the words we andyou makes it sound like their give tongue to the we as the population (including themselves) and the you is the government/constitutions. Musical influences and voices are used again by Lennon in 1971 in his song Imagine imagine theres no countries nothing to kill or ease up for imagine all the people living in peace. I dont think it can be said the Beatles changed the worlds opinion on the Vietnam war here its evident that they all have the same view an d they simply gave it media coverage and a larger voice due to their popularity.Again, the argument is strengthened by the fact the Beatles religious views didnt become widespread, nor did they introduce them to the UK in the first place their alternate religions and the high profile reports about these different faiths were not the initial foot of them into British society. Since amendments were made to the British Nationality law in the 1940s, people from the commonwealth islands (including India) had been immigrating to the UK for nearly 20 years this meant that people of the Hindu and other religions had already introduced these faiths into British society and the world was already changing to be more cultural before the Beatles choice to follow them.The band only created higher popularity for these faiths amongst the population. Also their views on Christianity and Catholicism werent widely accepted 1966 John Lennon made the statement the Beatles were more popular than Jesus which created uproar in America, especially in the south that are strong Catholics. Younger generations burned all their merchandise and refused to accept the band as role models again. There was no change here taken place, only rejection of the new which opposes sources 17 and 18. However source 16 does support this the whole bourgeois system is exactly the same, Lennon recognizes that they didnt change the world due to religious or other issues.patronage this, the view that they reflected a changing world is once more reinforced by their drug use mentioned in source 18, which before seemed to be solely created by them but according to Paul McCartney, they were introduced to drugs, before they became famous, whilst they were in Hamburg. He stated, in 2004, that they felt everyone was doing them and they were told to inhale this, but it did nothing for me when talking aboutBenzedrine.This tells us that it wasnt the Beatles who initiated drug use, but in fact others introduced th em to it. Also, relating back to the legalization of marijuana advertisement, we have to consider that it also had signatures from sixty-four other celebrities, including the Rolling Stones who were infamous for their drug and alcohol use, which suggests it was a widespread relocation not a singular band who lead the way into the psychedelic era. The wheels of the hippie period had started turning, originating in America in the early sixties, a long time before the Beatles arrived on the drug scene. apparently America influenced the Beatles into taking the harder drugs, such as LSD, not visa versa, just the bands music, media coverage and opinions expressed the issue with hallucinogenic drugs more than theyd been dealt with before.All in all, I think although it could be argued that the Beatles changed the world in the sixties they created leading protests against the Vietnam War, they introduced new religions to the younger generations, they were brave enough to announce their di s-belief in the tradition faiths and created the start of the psychedelic era all of which received great support from the new youth culture. Source 18 supports this thoroughly the Beatles changed the world in the sixties twentieth century significant achievement, source 17 also upkeeps the argument instantly chic for millions of fans who looked to the group for guidance.But, its evident that the four mens involvement with the Vietnam War protests were only echoing the publics opinions, that drug use was popular before the band became famous and their religious views didnt have an affect on the world the Beatles only followed the crowd and their status expressed the issues. Which is again supported through both source 17 and 18 although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth culture, they were by no means its architects, innovators and spokespersons.In conclusion I think you can see the shifting world influenced the Beatles views and opinions and it was their famous status that seemed to express new ideas to the youth and society they gathered their anti-war, alternate religions and drug use by things they experienced happening in the paltry world of the sixties. Source 16 also disagrees with the statement that the Beatles changed the world in the sixties, Lennon says, nothing happened, that the world wasexactly the same and the band dressed up.Despite it seems hes recognizing no change, he does notice the four men had a slight influence middle-class with long hair, their hallmark look was popular which they had adopted from the late 50s mod fashion and the changing hippie fashions. In conclusion, I dont think the Beatles changed the world in the sixties, I think its evident that the band merely reflected the changing world, giving it a louder voice due to their famous status.